Ultrasound super-resolution imaging for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction: A pilot study
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and practical application of ultrasound (US) super-resolution imaging (SRI) in evaluating microvasculature and measuring renal allograft function. Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients who received kidney transplants were prospectively enrolled. The patients were assigned as: normal allograft function (n = 6), and allograft malfunction (n = 10). Localizing each potential contrast signal resulted in super-resolution images (SRI). SRI was utilized to assess micro-vessel density (MVD) and microvascular flow rate, whereas contrast-enhanced (CE) US images were statistically processed to get the time to peak (TTP) and peak intensity. Logistic regression was utilized to evaluate their relationship. Results: US SRI may be utilized effectively on allografts to show microvasculature with significantly higher resolution than typical color Doppler flow and CEUS pictures. In the multivariate analysis, MVD and TTP were significant US markers of renal allograft failure (p = 0.031 and p = 0.045). The combination of MVD and TTP produced an AUC of 0.783 (p < 0.05) for allograft dysfunction. Conclusions: SRI can accurately portray the microvasculature of renal allografts, while MVD and TTP are appropriate US markers for assessing renal allograft failure.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Ultrasound super-resolution imaging for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction: A pilot study
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.