Pathogenic relevance of antibodies against desmoglein 3 in patients with oral lichen planus
Rattachement africain : de, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a T cell driven disorder that significantly impairs patients' quality of life. Previous reports suggest that both cellular and humoral activities against desmoglein (dsg) 1 and 3 may be involved in OLP pathogenesis. Here, we aim to analyze the frequency of occurrence and pathological significance of anti-dsg antibodies in a large cohort of OLP patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: OLP patients were screened for anti-dsg antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in three tertiary referral centers. OLP sera with anti-dsg antibodies were further analyzed by Western blot and dispase-based keratinocyte dissociation assay (DDA) to identify the targeted dsg ectodomains and to assess their pathogenicity. RESULTS: Of 151-screened individuals with OLP, only four patients (2.6%) with erosive OLP showed serum IgG against dsg1/3. Western blot analysis with recombinant dsg3 ectodomains revealed preferential recognition of the extracellular domain 5. By DDA with spontaneously immortalized human keratinocytes, none of the sera from these four patients induced acantholysis. CONCLUSIONS: Activation of humoral immunity occurs prevalently in patients with erosive OLP, probably due to epitope spreading. OLP serum antibodies are unable to induce loss of intercellular adhesion in vitro, strongly suggesting that they are not disease causing but rather an epiphenomenon.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pathogenic relevance of antibodies against desmoglein 3 in patients with oral lichen planus
- Date Crossref
- 16/08/2024
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.