CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing delivered by a single AAV9 vector inhibits HSV-1 reactivation in a latent rabbit keratitis model
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Herpes simples virus 1 (HSV-1) keratitis is a major cause of blindness globally. During primary infection, HSV-1 travels to the trigeminal ganglia and establishes lifelong latency. Although some treatments can reduce symptom severity and recurrence, there is no cure for HSV-1 keratitis. We used CRISPR-Cas9 to co-target gene sequences encoding two essential HSV-1 proteins, ICP0 and ICP27, as a potential therapy for HSV-1 keratitis. In HSV-1-infected Vero cells, the HSV-1 viral load and titer were significantly reduced by plasmid transfection or AAV2 vector transduction expressing Cas9 nuclease from Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9) and paired guide RNAs (gRNAs). Off-target assessment showed minimal off-target editing activity from the selected gRNAs. We then tested our CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing approach in a latent rabbit model of HSV-1 keratitis. Corneal scarification with all-in-one AAV8(Y733F)-SaCas9 or AAV9-SaCas9 vector reduced viral shedding by over 50%. Interestingly, intravenous administration of the same AAV9-SaCas9 vector eliminated viral shedding in 92% of treated eyes. In addition, treated trigeminal ganglia showed a reduction in HSV-1 DNA and RNA expression. Our results support the utility of single-dose AAV9 all-in-one CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing as a safe and effective strategy for treating HSV-1 keratitis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing delivered by a single AAV9 vector inhibits HSV-1 reactivation in a latent rabbit keratitis model
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.