Use of topical rSm29 in combination with intravenous meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: A randomized controlled trial
Rattachement africain : br, id, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis is associated with an inflammatory response. Granzyme (GzmB) and IL-1β play a key role in the pathology. Meglumine antimoniate (MA) is the first-choice drug for the treatment of CL, but therapy failure is observed in up to 50% of the cases. The protein, rSm29 of Schistosoma mansoni, down-modulates pro-inflammatory cytokine production. We evaluate if the combination of topical rSm29 plus MA increases the cure rate of CL. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 91 CL patients were allocated in 3 groups. All cases received MA (20 mg/kg/weight) for 20 days. Group 1 used topical rSm29 (10 µg), group 2 a placebo topically applied, and group 3 received only MA. RESULTS: The cure rate on day 90 was 71% in subjects treated with rSm29 plus MA, and 43% in patients who received MA plus placebo or MA alone (P < 0.05). There was a decrease in GzmB and an increase in IFN-γ (P < 0.05) in supernatants of skin biopsies of the lesions obtained on D7 of therapy (P < 0.05) in patients who received rSm29. CONCLUSION: rSm29 associated with MA reduces GzmB levels, is more effective than MA alone, and decreases CL healing time. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov under NCT06000514.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Use of topical rSm29 in combination with intravenous meglumine antimoniate in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: A randomized controlled trial
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.