The Impact of Restricted Grazing Systems on the Behaviour and Welfare of Ponies

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Equine obesity is a growing concern, much of the current management advice centres on dietary restrictions, including the removal or limitation of grazing. Little is known about the effectiveness and impact of this approach on the overall welfare of the horse. Objective: This study investigates the impact of two commonly used grazing systems advocated for the control of weight – the ‘strip-grazing’ system and the ‘track’ system - on the behaviour and welfare of outdoor living ponies. Study design: A within-subject cross-over experimental design was used with four groups of pasture kept ponies experiencing each system for 4 weeks in a random order. Methods: Time budgets and behavioural indicators of welfare were measured using 24-hour electronic surveillance, morphometric parameters including weight, body condition score and cresty neck score were measured weekly and activity levels were tracked using GPS tracking units. Results: Ponies moved more (median (IQR), track: 3.23% (2.08%), strip: 2.02% (0.90%); P = 0.001) and travelled a greater distance in 24-hour period (median (IQR), track: 7013.47m (1761.49m), strip: 5331.91m (494.16m); P < 0.001) and engaged in less overt agonistic behaviour on the track system compared with the strip system (median IQR; track: 0.14 (0.30), strip: 0.21 (0.37) P = 0.02). Main Limitations: A relatively short time period of exposure to each grazing system. Conclusions: Track systems resulted in a significant increase in ambulatory behaviour compared with the strip system. Increased levels of agonistic interactions on the strip system maybe the result of perceived reduction of space or a spatial concentration of resources compared to the track system, although the actual accessible area was the same. These results suggest that there may be physical health benefits to the track system as the ponies engaged in more voluntary low intensity exercise as well as improvements to overall welfare.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.