Pulmonary fibrosis insights and therapy targets from disease models and administration of the lipophilic diterpene, sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate: Review and meta-analysis
Le résumé fourni par la source
Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a chronic and progressive pulmonary interstitial disease of unknown etiology and is also a sequela in severe patients with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Seven databases were systematically searched to evaluate the preclinical evidence of Tanshinone IIA (Tan IIA) on PF. The quality of the included studies was assessed using a 10-item risk of bias tool, and data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software. 22 experiments from 12 studies on a total of 248 animals were included. The results showed that PF phenotype, such as fibrotic score, collagen I (Col-I), collagen III (Col-III), hydroxyproline (Hyp), in the group treated with Tan IIA were significantly lower than those in the model group (p < 0.00001). The potential mechanisms of Tan IIA improvement of PF involve reducing inflammation, antioxidation, and suppressing activation of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1). The subgroup analysis of different models, different rat species, and different dosage time showed significant reduction in fibrotic scores and Hyp levels with Tan IIA. The preclinical evidence indicated that Tan IIA might be a potent and promising agent for PF, but this conclusion should be further confirmed with more research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Pulmonary fibrosis insights and therapy targets from disease models and administration of the lipophilic diterpene, sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate: Review and meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/10/2024
- Éditeur
- Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.