UiO-66-NH2-Embedded Nanofibrous Membrane for Cr(VI) Adsorption and Visible-Light Photocatalytic Reduction
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The environmental challenges caused by hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] cannot be ignored. Here, a novel oxidized PASS (OPASS)/UiO-66-NH 2 nanofibrous membrane (OPASS/U NM) was successfully fabricated by electrospinning and an in situ growth process and applied for the removal of Cr(VI). It is found that the OPASS/U NM exhibits high adsorption performance due to its large surface area. Meanwhile, UiO-66-NH 2 particles are seamlessly and uniformly embedded on the surface of the OPASS fiber, which would endow the OPASS/U NM with photocatalysis reduction performance. Thus, under visible light, the OPASS/U NM could rapidly absorb Cr(VI) and reduce it to Cr(III), and the maximum removal capacity at pH 3.0 reached 20.10 mg/g. Furthermore, a possible photocatalytic reaction mechanism for removal of Cr(VI) is proposed. The OPASS/U NM also exhibits good stability, outstanding solvent resistance, and excellent recyclability. It retains a 92% reduction efficiency even after three cycles and shows a high recovery rate (>95%). More importantly, it can endure a series of strong polar solvents such as dimethylacetamide, N -methylpyrrolidone, and N, N -dimethylformamide. This research not only offers a strategy for enhancing the removal of Cr(VI) but also introduces a composite membrane suitable for wastewater containing aggressive solvents.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- UiO-66-NH<sub>2</sub>-Embedded Nanofibrous Membrane for Cr(VI) Adsorption and Visible-Light Photocatalytic Reduction
- Date Crossref
- 09/08/2024
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.