The effect of long-standing lymphopenia after radiation therapy on survival in rectal cancer

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Lymphopenia and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are known negative prognostic factors in rectal cancer. Until recently, however, lymphopenia was regarded as a minor sequela following radiation therapy (RT). The immune system's influence on rectal cancer treatment outcomes led us to evaluate the impact of lymphopenia at various time points, before, during, and following radiotherapy. We hypothesized that chronic lymphopenia following radiotherapy might negatively influence the survival of patients, and pre-treatment lymphopenia may be predictive of poor outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 110 patients treated for rectal cancer between 2015 and 2019. The oncological outcomes are defined as alive without disease (AWOD), alive with disease (AWD), and death. These outcome probabilities tested against variables of lymphopenia before RT, during RT, and at several post-RT follow-up time points. RESULTS: At the end of the study, 69 patients were AWOD (63 %), 13 were AWD (12 %) and 28 had died (25 %). Treatment results were assessed with according level of lymphocytes measured one year following RT: 35 out of 39 patients (89.7 %) with normal values were AWOD. In 65 patients with sustained lymphopenia, 52 % were AWOD, 18.5 % AWD and 29 % died. A similar difference was found at all time-points up to 2 years following RT (p < 0.004). The results of our study shows that pre-existing lymphopenia (prior to RT) is associated with a 3 times greater chance of death compared to patients with normal lymphocyte levels prior to RT. The PFS significantly affected by lymphopenia at all time-points after RT. An NLR of more than 4 was associated with a 3-time higher risk of recurrence than lower NLR scores (p = 0.0054). CONCLUSION: Our results support the relevance of lymphopenia and NLR in the prognosis of rectal cancer. We believe this is the first study showing a negative correlation between sustained lymphopenia and OS following RT.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.