Contralateral approach to giant ruptured and unruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysms: patient series
Rattachement africain : al, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Giant ophthalmic artery (OphA) aneurysms remain surgically challenging despite the progress in endovascular treatments. This study describes the contralateral interoptic corridor in select patients based on imaging criteria suitable for clipping. The aim of this study was to show that despite the growing use of novel endovascular techniques, such as coil embolization and flow diversion, for the treatment of OphA aneurysms, microsurgical clipping may still be preferred for giant ones under certain conditions. OBSERVATIONS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of the microsurgical treatment of unruptured and ruptured giant OphA aneurysms at the University Hospital Center "Mother Teresa," Tirana, from 2007 to 2016. Four patients were selected for microsurgery and the contralateral approach using ophthalmic evaluations and coronal imaging on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and digital subtraction angiography that demonstrated aneurysms with a small neck and an orientation between 11 and 13 on the coronal clock face. A prefixed chiasm was a contraindication to this approach. LESSONS: Giant OphA aneurysms can be safely clipped through a contralateral interoptic corridor without creating new visual deficits or a residual aneurysm. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE2473.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Contralateral approach to giant ruptured and unruptured ophthalmic artery aneurysms: patient series
- Date Crossref
- 05/08/2024
- Éditeur
- Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.