Examining the local Universe isotropy with galaxy cluster velocity dispersion scaling relations

Le résumé fourni par la source

In standard cosmology, the late Universe is assumed to be statistically homogeneous and isotropic. However, a recent study based on galaxy clusters by Migkas et al. (2021, arXiv:2103.13904) found an apparent spatial variation of approximately $9\%$ in the Hubble constant, $H_0$, across the sky. The authors utilised galaxy cluster scaling relations between various cosmology-dependent cluster properties and a cosmology-independent property, i.e., the temperature of the intracluster gas $(T)$. A position-dependent systematic bias of $T$ measurements can, in principle, result in an overestimation of apparent $H_0$ variations. In this study, we search for directional $T$ measurement biases by examining the scaling relation between the member galaxy velocity dispersion and the gas temperature $(σ_\mathrm{v}-T)$. Additionally, we search for apparent $H_0$ angular variations independently of $T$ by analysing the relations between the X-ray luminosity and Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal with the velocity dispersion, $L_\mathrm{X}-σ_\mathrm{v}$ and $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-σ_\mathrm{v}$. We utilise Monte Carlo simulations of isotropic cluster samples to quantify the statistical significance of any observed anisotropies. We find no significant directional $T$ measurement biases, and the probability that a directional $T$ bias causes the previously observed $H_0$ anisotropy is only $0.002\%$. On the other hand, from the joint analysis of the $L_\mathrm{X}-σ_\mathrm{v}$ and $Y_\mathrm{SZ}-σ_\mathrm{v}$ relations, the maximum variation of $H_0$ is found in the direction of $(295^\circ\pm71^\circ, -30^\circ\pm71^\circ)$ with a statistical significance of $3.64σ$, fully consistent with arXiv:2103.13904. Our findings strongly corroborate the previously detected spatial anisotropy of galaxy cluster scaling relations using a new independent cluster property, $σ_\mathrm{v}$.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.