Exploring communicative interactions in debriefing sessions with nursing students: A qualitative study

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Debriefing as a learning activity aims to elevate participants' competence through communicative interaction. This activity is an integral component of any formative simulation. Thus, the primary objective of this study was to explore debriefing as a communicative experience in nursing students within the context of interactive virtual simulation. The secondary objectives were: 1) To investigate the typology of interactions based on participants' discourse and 2) To identify the actions that students use to develop knowledge during debriefing. METHOD: A qualitative exploratory study design involving six debriefing groups was conducted with 105 s-year nursing students. The debriefing sessions were analyzed following interactive virtual simulations in an in-person setting in the classroom. All sessions were recorded and transcribed verbatim. A mixed (deductive and inductive) content analysis approach was used. RESULTS: A total of 2187 units of meaning were identified and categorized into 3 themes (interaction by participant, interaction by communicative action, and interaction by participant's communicative goal); nine subthemes (facilitator-student, student-student and student-facilitator; declarative - unidirectional, reactive - bidirectional and multidirectional-interactive; individualistic, competitive, and collaborative), and 5 categories (providing information; generating creative solutions; processing critical and deliberative information; positive interdependence and psychosocial relationships). CONCLUSION: The students developed knowledge and practical communication skills, particularly reinforcing soft skills through collaborative interactions, predominantly multidirectional-interactive in nature. The facilitator and the interpersonal relationships among the participants fostered a safe and positive environment.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.