Evaluating the Outcomes of Managing Displaced Clavicular Fractures by Using Precontoured Clavicular Plates

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background and objective Midshaft clavicular fractures were managed conservatively in the past, with a significant incidence of nonunion and poor functional outcomes in displaced fractures. Anatomically precontoured clavicle plates, since their introduction, have proved to be a superior method for managing these fractures. While open reduction and internal fixation of displaced clavicular fractures with plates have produced successful functional outcomes, complications like plate prominence, scar, postoperative numbness, wound dehiscence, refracture, and infection continue to discourage surgeons from plating these fractures. This study aimed to evaluate whether the precontoured 3.5-mm locking compression plate (LCP) for the clavicle is effective in the management of displaced clavicular fractures with minimum risk of complications. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted among 26 patients with displaced clavicular fractures that were managed with 3.5-mm precontoured LCP. The functional outcome was assessed by using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and healing was assessed radiographically six months postoperatively. Results Twenty-five patients were available for the final follow-up at the end of 24 weeks. All of them achieved excellent functional scores. The mean CMS was 94.9. No complication was observed in 85% of the cases. Implant failure was observed in both fractures of a bilateral clavicle fracture patient within a month of surgery. Implant irritation without prominence was seen in one patient and another had a prominent postoperative scar. The mean time for the radiological union was 13.8 weeks with union time ranging from three to five months. Conclusions Based on our findings, employing 3.5-mm precontoured clavicular LCPs is a useful technique that can provide good functional outcomes in displaced clavicular fractures.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.