Aller au contenu principal
2024 article

Mycoplasma genitaliumtreatment outcomes among a cohort failing macrolide resistance-guided treatment across three London sexual health clinics

6Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective British guidelines advise treatment ofMycoplasma genitalium(Mgen) infection using the results of macrolide resistance-associated mutation (MRAM) assays. Limited data informs management when patients fail MRAM-guided treatment. This study evaluates current management strategies employed for cases ofMgeninfection with MRAM-guided treatment failure. Design This retrospective analysis reviewed laboratory and clinical data pertaining to all positiveMgenresults between 28 May 2020 and 05 November 2022 across three London sexual health clinics. Treatment failure was defined as microbiological or clinical failure, despite appropriate MRAM-guided treatment with full compliance and no re-infection risk. Where MRAM status was unable to be determined, samples were excluded. Results 340 samples were included from mostly male (74.4%) patients with a mean age of 30 years. The majority of tests were sent for urethritis (63.8%), and most infections were present without concurrent STIs (83.5%). 183 (53.8%) samples were MRAM positive; 157 (46.1%) were wild type. 152/183 (83.1%) received MRAM-guided treatment. 49/152 (32.2%) cases of MRAM-guided treatment failure were identified. 32/49 (65.3%) achieved either microbiological or clinical cure through a variety of treatment regimens. 66.6% of nine patients who received pristinamycin achieved microbiological cure; two patients were cured by minocycline. Many patients received multiple courses of moxifloxacin despite previous failures. Conclusion Whilst high compliance with recommended MRAM-guided therapy was identified, there were also high rates of quinolone therapy failure (32.2%). Barriers to appropriate treatment include a lack of quinolone resistance assays and the non-availability of sitafloxacin in Europe, along with the limited availability of pristinamycin and minocycline in the UK during the study dates. We recommend developing a standardised management pathway for treatment resistant cases.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
<i>Mycoplasma genitalium</i>treatment outcomes among a cohort failing macrolide resistance-guided treatment across three London sexual health clinics
Date Crossref
01/08/2024
Éditeur
BMJ
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Reproductive tract infections researchGenital Health and DiseaseAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.