Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rehabilitation Methods for Stroke Survivors

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: One of the challenges in stroke management is how to provide rehabilitation services to stroke patients in Iran. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the cost-effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions for stroke patients in three settings: Hospitals, stroke units, and homes. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from the perspective of the health system. A Markov model with a 20-year time horizon and 3-month cycles was used to analyze costs and outcomes. Cost data were collected from 210 patients undergoing rehabilitation in hospitals, homes, or stroke units. The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was conducted by calculating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using Tree Age software. Results: The average rehabilitation cost for the home strategy ($2306 ± 35.018) was less than that for the hospital ($2955 ± 48.18) and stroke unit ($3485 ± 51.63) strategies. Furthermore, the QALY of the home strategy (26.03) was 8 times higher than that of the hospital (17.99) and 19 times higher than that of the stroke unit (7.03). The average cost-effectiveness ratios for the hospital, stroke unit, and home groups were $11424, $33159, and $7233 per QALY, respectively. The ICERs for stroke unit and home rehabilitation relative to hospital rehabilitation were $2517 and $2145 per QALY, respectively. Conclusions: According to the results, the home-based rehabilitation strategy is more cost-effective than hospital and stroke unit rehabilitation strategies. Given the high rates of stroke and its associated costs in Iran, it is suggested that policymakers lay the groundwork for providing these services at home.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.