Challenges of safety culture in Surgical Center: mixed methods study
Rattachement africain : br, pt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: to analyze the safety attitudes of health and support areas professionals working in Surgical Center. METHOD: sequential explanatory mixed methods study. The quantitative stage covered 172 health and support professionals in eight Surgical Centers of a hospital complex. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Surgical Center was applied. In the subsequent qualitative stage, 16 professionals participated in the Focus Group. Photographic methods were used from the perspective of ecological and restorative thinking, and data analysis occurred in an integrated manner, through connection. RESULTS: the general score, by group of Surgical Centers, based on the domains of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire/Surgical Center, reveals a favorable perception of the safety climate, with emphasis on the domains Stress Perception, Communication in the Surgical Environment, Safety Climate and Perception of Professional Performance. The overall analysis of the domain Communication and Collaboration between Teams appears positive and is corroborated by data from the qualitative stage, which highlights the importance of interaction and communication between healthcare teams as fundamental for daily work. CONCLUSION: the perception of safety attitudes among health and support professionals was positive. The perception of the nursing team stands out as closer or more favorable to attitudes consistent with the safety culture.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Challenges of safety culture in Surgical Center: mixed methods study
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2024
- Éditeur
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Escola Superior de Enfermagem da Universidade do Porto pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Universidade de São Paulo pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Escola de Enfermagem pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Escola Superior de Enfermagem da Universidade do Porto et Universidade de São Paulo, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.