Prediction of early-phase cytomegalovirus pneumonia in post-stem cell transplantation using a deep learning model
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic challenges exist for CMV pneumonia in post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (post-HSCT) patients, despite early-phase radiographic changes. OBJECTIVE: The study aims to employ a deep learning model distinguishing CMV pneumonia from COVID-19 pneumonia, community-acquired pneumonia, and normal lungs post-HSCT. METHODS: Initially, 6 neural network models were pre-trained with COVID-19 pneumonia, community-acquired pneumonia, and normal lung CT images from Kaggle's COVID multiclass dataset (Dataset A), then Dataset A was combined with the CMV pneumonia images from our center, forming Dataset B. We use a few-shot transfer learning strategy to fine-tune the pre-trained models and evaluate model performance in Dataset B. RESULTS: 34 cases of CMV pneumonia were found between January 2018 and December 2022 post-HSCT. Dataset A contained 1681 images of each subgroup from Kaggle. Combined with Dataset A, Dataset B was initially formed by 98 images of CMV pneumonia and normal lung. The optimal model (Xception) achieved an accuracy of 0.9034. Precision, recall, and F1-score all reached 0.9091, with an AUC of 0.9668 in the test set of Dataset B. CONCLUSIONS: This framework demonstrates the deep learning model's ability to distinguish rare pneumonia types utilizing a small volume of CT images, facilitating early detection of CMV pneumonia post-HSCT.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prediction of early-phase cytomegalovirus pneumonia in post-stem cell transplantation using a deep learning model
- Date Crossref
- 03/09/2024
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.