Common and rare genetic variants predisposing females to unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a major reproductive health issue with multifactorial causes, affecting 2.6% of all pregnancies worldwide. Nearly half of the RPL cases lack clinically identifiable causes (e.g., antiphospholipid syndrome, uterine anomalies, and parental chromosomal abnormalities), referred to as unexplained RPL (uRPL). Here, we perform a genome-wide association study focusing on uRPL in 1,728 cases and 24,315 female controls of Japanese ancestry. We detect significant associations in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region at 6p21 (lead variant=rs9263738; P = 1.4 × 10 −10 ; odds ratio [OR] = 1.51 [95% CI: 1.33–1.72]; risk allele frequency = 0.871). The MHC associations are fine-mapped to the classical HLA alleles, HLA-C*12:02, HLA-B*52:01, and HLA-DRB1*15:02 ( P = 1.1 × 10 −10 , 1.5 × 10 −10 , and 1.2 × 10 −9 , respectively), which constitute a population-specific common long-range haplotype with a protective effect ( P = 2.8 × 10 −10 ; OR = 0.65 [95% CI: 0.57–0.75]; haplotype frequency=0.108). Genome-wide copy-number variation (CNV) calling demonstrates rare predicted loss-of-function (pLoF) variants of the cadherin-11 gene ( CDH11 ) conferring the risk of uRPL ( P = 1.3 × 10 −4 ; OR = 3.29 [95% CI: 1.78–5.76]). Our study highlights the importance of reproductive immunology and rare variants in the uRPL etiology.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Common and rare genetic variants predisposing females to unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss
- Date Crossref
- 17/07/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.