Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?

52Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
98Institutions déclarées
29Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : th, cn, nl, nz, br, dk, it, Afrique du Sud, pl, de, in, ca, us, gb, au, si, cr, cl, es, kr, hu, cy, fr, ru, ir, at, pt, jp, Botswana. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

The global diversity of fungi has been estimated between 2 to 11 million species, of which only about 155 000 have been named. Most fungi are invisible to the unaided eye, but they represent a major component of biodiversity on our planet, and play essential ecological roles, supporting life as we know it. Although approximately 20 000 fungal genera are presently recognised, the ecology of most remains undetermined. Despite all this diversity, the mycological community actively researches some fungal genera more commonly than others. This poses an interesting question: why have some fungal genera impacted mycology and related fields more than others? To address this issue, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to identify the top 100 most cited fungal genera. A thorough database search of the Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed was performed to establish which genera are most cited. The most cited 10 genera are Saccharomyces, Candida, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Penicillium, Trichoderma, Botrytis, Pichia, Cryptococcus and Alternaria. Case studies are presented for the 100 most cited genera with general background, notes on their ecology and economic significance and important research advances. This paper provides a historic overview of scientific research of these genera and the prospect for further research.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
What are the 100 most cited fungal genera?
Date Crossref
01/01/2024
Éditeur
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Mae Fah Luang UniversityGuizhou Academy of Agricultural SciencesWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity InstituteManaaki Whenua – Landcare ResearchUniversidade Federal de São PauloTechnical University of DenmarkNational Science and Technology Development AgencyNational Center for Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyInstitute of Sciences of Food ProductionNational Research CouncilUniversity of PretoriaChinese Academy of SciencesInstitute of MicrobiologyUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesWest Pomeranian University of Technology in SzczecinMartin Luther University Halle-WittenbergBrazilian Agricultural Research CorporationUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteGauhati UniversityUniversity of TurinUniversity of AmsterdamWestern UniversitySouthwest Forestry UniversityUniversity of Silesia in KatowiceQujing Normal UniversityKunming Institute of BotanyChiang Mai UniversitySyngenta (United States)London Rebuilding SocietySecretaria da EducaçãoSecretaria de Estado da Educação de GoiásRoyal Botanic Gardens, KewJulius Kühn-InstitutUniversity of Agriculture in KrakowUniversity of KentuckyJohann Heinrich von Thünen-InstitutMurdoch UniversityUniversity of LjubljanaUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonUniversidad de Costa RicaBowie State UniversityStellenbosch UniversityUniversidade Federal de ViçosaBeijing Forestry UniversitySenckenberg Museum für Naturkunde GörlitzUniversidade Federal de PernambucoUniversity of Bari Aldo MoroUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaUniversity of ChileUniversitat Rovira i VirgiliUniversidade Federal Rural de PernambucoChina Astronaut Research and Training CenterAgricultural Research Council of South AfricaKyung Hee UniversityEszterhazy Karoly Catholic UniversityUniversity of Southern QueenslandMarche Polytechnic UniversityHUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai KutatóközpontInstitute of BiochemistryLimassol General HospitalHelmholtz Centre for Infection ResearchTechnische Universität BraunschweigThe University of QueenslandAgriculture and FoodARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and AgricultureUniversité de LilleLaboratoire de Mécanique et Génie CivilLaboratoire de Génie Civil et Géo EnvironnementRussian Academy of SciencesTula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. TolstoyGoethe University FrankfurtSoil Conservation and Watershed Management ResearchAgricultural Research & Education OrganizationUniversität InnsbruckUniversity of LisbonUniversity of the Free StateUnited States Department of AgricultureCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de BordeauxInstitut de Biochimie et Génétique CellulairesState Museum of Natural History KarlsruheUniversité Paris CitéLaboratoire Interdisciplinaire des Énergies de DemainFederal Institute of São PauloAkademie der bildenden Künste WienUniversity of TorontoPublic Health OntarioMie UniversitySenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research CentreUniversitat de LleidaUniversity of PerugiaTiFNUniversidade Federal da ParaíbaJilin Agricultural UniversityYangzhou UniversityLeibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell CulturesBotswana International University of Science and TechnologyUtrecht University

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.