Direct biomechanical manipulation of human gait stability: A systematic review
Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
People fall more often when their gait stability is reduced. Gait stability can be directly manipulated by exerting forces or moments onto a person, ranging from simple walking sticks to complex wearable robotics. A systematic review of the literature was performed to determine: What is the level of evidence for different types of mechanical manipulations on improving gait stability? The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020180631). Databases Embase, Medline All, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched. The final search was conducted on the 1st of December, 2022. The included studies contained mechanical devices that influence gait stability for both impaired and non-impaired subjects. Studies performed with prosthetic devices, passive orthoses, and analysing post-training effects were excluded. An adapted NIH quality assessment tool was used to assess the study quality and risk of bias. Studies were grouped based on the type of device, point of application, and direction of forces and moments. For each device type, a best-evidence synthesis was performed to quantify the level of evidence based on the type of validity of the reported outcome measures and the study quality assessment score. Impaired and non-impaired study participants were considered separately. From a total of 4701 papers, 53 were included in our analysis. For impaired subjects, indicative evidence was found for medio-lateral pelvis stabilisation for improving gait stability, while limited evidence was found for hip joint assistance and canes. For non-impaired subjects, moderate evidence was found for medio-lateral pelvis stabilisation and limited evidence for body weight support. For all other device types, either indicative or insufficient evidence was found for improving gait stability. Our findings also highlight the lack of consensus on outcome measures amongst studies of devices focused on manipulating gait.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Direct biomechanical manipulation of human gait stability: A systematic review
- Date Crossref
- 11/07/2024
- Éditeur
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Erasmus MC pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Delft University of Technology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Codarts Rotterdam pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Erasmus Medical Center Rehabilitation Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Technical University of Delft Department of Biomechanical Engineering pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Rijndam Rehabilitation Center pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Erasmus MC, Delft University of Technology et Codarts Rotterdam, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.