291 We’re all in this together – a qualitative metasynthesis of emergency providers’ and patients’ views on shared decision making
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction Emergency medicine holds unique challenges and opportunities for patient support, especially with respect to shared decision making. As the qualitative framework for emergency patient’ decision support is still primitive, this study longs to illustrate emergency providers’ and patients’ attitudes towards shared decision making to inform future implementation projects. Methods Following ENTREQ-Guidelines, this study longs to synthesize available qualitative data on emergency medicine providers’ and patients’ views on shared decision making. Feasible studies were identified by searching through a previously conducted and published scoping review about the current state of shared decision making in emergency medicine. Separated into patient and provider side, influencing factors, barriers and facilitators were thematically grouped and further outlined through an interpretivist approach. Results As the study is currently being conducted, results cannot be stated at this point. Listeners will be provided with an overview of factors, barriers and facilitators emergency providers and patients describe towards shared decision making. This metasynthesis is supposed to aid in future shared decision making implementations in emergency medicine. Discussion Will be provided during the conference. Conclusion(s) Will be provided during the conference.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- 291 We’re all in this together – a qualitative metasynthesis of emergency providers’ and patients’ views on shared decision making
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2024
- Éditeur
- BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Jena University Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
University of Lübeck pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Department of Emergency Medicine at University Hospital Jena pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
National Competency Center for Shared Decision Making at University Medical Centre Schleswig-Holstein pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Jena University Hospital, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein et University of Lübeck, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.