The Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension

Le résumé fourni par la source

AIMS: Right ventricular (RV) failure is one of the leading causes of death in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Conventional echocardiographic parameters are not included in risk stratification and follow-up for prognostic assessment due to PH's diverse nature and the RV's complex geometry. RV outflow tract velocity time integral (RVOT VTI) is a simple, non-invasive estimate of pulmonary flow and an echocardiographic surrogate of RV stroke volume. In this study, we aimed to define the prognostic value of RVOT VTI in PH patients. METHODS: Sixty-three subjects with idiopathic PAH (IPAH) (n = 23), connective tissue disease-associated PAH (CTD-associated PAH) (n = 19) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n = 21) were retrospectively included. A comprehensive two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation, including RVOT-VTI measurement, was performed during the follow-up and the New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA FC), 6 min walk distance (6MWD) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were recorded. RESULTS: The median age of the whole cohort was 63 years (52-68), and 47 (74.6%) of the patients were women. The median follow-up period was 20 months (11-33), and 20 (31.7%) patients died in this period. BNP values were higher [317 (210-641) vs 161 (47-466), P = 0.02], and 6MWD values were lower [197.5 ± 89.5 vs 339 ± 146.3, P < 0.0001] in the non-survivor group, and the non-survivor group had a worse NYHA-FC (P = 0.02). Among echocardiographic data, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (15.4 ± 4.8 vs 18.6 ± 4.2, P = 0.01) and RVOT VTI (11.9 ± 4.1 vs 17.2 ± 4.3, P < 0.0001) values were lower whereas right atrial area (RAA) (26.9 ± 10.1 vs 22.2 ± 7.1, P = 0.04) values were higher in the non-survivor group. The area under curve of the RVOT VTI for predicting mortality was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.715-0.940, P < 0.0001], and the best cut-off value was 14.7 cm with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 77%. Survival was significantly lower in subjects with RVOT VTI ≤ 14.7 cm (log-rank P < 0.0001). Survival rates for patients with RVOT VTI ≤ 14.7 cm were 70% at 1 year, 50% at 2 years, %29 at 3 years and 21% at 5 years. The univariate determinants of all-cause mortality were BNP [hazard ratio (HR) 1.001 (1.001-1.002), P = 0.001], 6MWD [HR 0.994 (0.990-0.999), P = 0.012] and NYHA-FC III-IV [HR 3.335 (1.103-10.083), P = 0.03], TAPSE [HR 0.838 (0.775-0.929), P = 0.001], RAA [HR 1.072 (1.013-1.135), P = 0.016] and RVOT VTI [HR 0.819 (0.740-0.906), P < 0.0001]. RVOT VTI was found to be the only independent determinant of mortality [HR 0.857 (0.766-0.960), P = 0.008]. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased RVOT VTI predicts mortality in patients with PH and each 1 mm decrease in RVOT VTI increases the risk of mortality by 14.3%. This parameter might serve as an additional parameter in the follow-up of these patients especially when 6MWD and NYHA-FC could not be determined.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.