Evaluation of Antral Biopsies Obtained in Endoscopically Normal Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Rattachement africain : il, tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: The requirement for routine biopsy sampling in esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with normal endoscopic findings is a subject of debate. In this study, patients who had normal endoscopic findings in EGD and underwent biopsy sampling were retrospectively analyzed. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 671 patients who underwent EGD between 2021 and 2023 in the Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital Surgical Endoscopy Unit. All patients had normal endoscopic findings and a sampling biopsy was performed on all patients included. Patients were evaluated based on demographic and clinicopathologic findings. This study was registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06269380). RESULTS: Two hundred sixty patients (38.7%) have abnormal histopathologic findings. Helicobacter pylori positivity was detected in 200 (29.8%) patients. Intestinal metaplasia (IM) was present in 80 of 260 patients (30.8%). The frequency of IM was higher in older age groups and cases with mild gastritis ( P <0.001). The frequency and severity of gastritis were associated with increased H. pylori positivity and density ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The biopsy sampling may contribute to the diagnosis and treatment process in cases where normal endoscopic findings are observed during EGD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of Antral Biopsies Obtained in Endoscopically Normal Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- Date Crossref
- 03/07/2024
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.