Optimal bolometer transfer function deconvolution for CMB experiments through maximum likelihood mapmaking
Rattachement africain : no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We revisit the impact of finite time responses of bolometric detectors used for deep observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Until now, bolometer transfer functions have been accounted for through a two-step procedure by first deconvolving an estimate of their Fourier-space representation from the raw time-ordered data (TOD), and then averaging the deconvolved TOD into pixelized maps. However, for many experiments, including thePlanckHigh Frequency Instrument (HFI), it is necessary to apply an additional low-pass filter to avoid an excessive noise boost, which leads to an asymmetric effective beam. In this paper we demonstrate that this effect can be avoided if the transfer function deconvolution and pixelization operations are performed simultaneously through integrated maximum likelihood mapmaking. The resulting algorithm is structurally identical to theartDecoalgorithm for beam deconvolution. We illustrate the relevance of this method with simulatedPlanckHFI 143 GHz data, and find that the resulting effective beam is both more symmetric than with the two-step procedure, resulting in a sky-averaged ellipticity that is 64% lower, and an effective beam full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) that is 2.3% smaller. Similar improvements are expected for any other bolometer-based CMB experiments with long time constants.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Optimal bolometer transfer function deconvolution for CMB experiments through maximum likelihood mapmaking
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2024
- Éditeur
- EDP Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.