Development and feasibility of an exercise therapy intervention for older women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer referred to neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to possible interval debulking surgery

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: This study describes the development and examines the feasibility of an exercise therapy program for women aged 70 years or older with advanced EOC, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before possible major surgery. Methods: In this feasibility study, patients participated in a mainly home-based exercise therapy program, including progressive resistance training, physical activity, and support from the supervising physiotherapist. The program included both supervised virtual and face-to-face sessions and self-administered daily exercise. Clinician-reported, patient-reported and physical performance measures were collected before and after NACT. Retention, adherence, and compliance to the program was monitored, and patient acceptability was explored in semi-structured interviews. Results: Fifteen patients, median age of 77 years (range 70-85) completed the exercise therapy program concurrently to receiving NACT lasting a median of 12 weeks. Patients were physically frail at baseline but improved at follow-up on measures of performance status, level of frailty, patient-reported physical fitness, lower body strength, aerobic functional capacity, basic mobility, balance, and number of steps per day. High levels of participation were found to both supervised and self-administered exercise. Patient interviews highlighted the homebased setting, the individualised tailoring of exercises and the support from the physiotherapist as reasons to complete the exercise therapy program as prescribed. Conclusions: The exercise therapy program was found to be feasible and acceptable in women aged 70 years or older with advanced EOC, receiving NACT before possible major surgery. The observed improvements and the positive experiences perceived by the patients support future application in research and clinical practice.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.