Elite athletes’ subjective wellbeing trajectories throughout the retirement transition: an analysis using Ruthven’s (2022) transition model
Rattachement africain : us, it, my. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIMS: Utilizing Ruthven's (2022) transition model, we explored how identity, voluntariness, and reason for retirement are related to subjective wellbeing throughout an athlete's retirement. METHODS: 541 participants completed an anonymous, online survey and estimated their wellbeing starting before retirement and up to the present. A set of linear mixed models regressed the seven wellbeing outcomes on the three measures, with education, gender, and time since retirement as covariates. RESULTS: Identity: Athletic Identity wellbeing was significantly and consistently lower than Diversified Identity. Voluntariness: Surprise retirement was significantly more difficult and contributed to a sharper decline on the day of transition. Reason for retirement: Pursue Something Else and Right Time experienced no significant wellbeing changes, while Injury had a significant decline on their transition day. Motivation Loss experienced significantly lower wellbeing prior to retirement, and a significant, gradual rise on the day of and throughout their transition. CONCLUSIONS: There are wellbeing benefits for a diverse identity, voluntary retirement, and retiring due to pursuing something else, or feeling ready to retire. At risk groups include retiring due to injury, low motivation, and loss of eligibility/graduation. Findings support the benefit of utilizing a theoretical model to explain elite athlete outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Elite athletes’ subjective wellbeing trajectories throughout the retirement transition: an analysis using Ruthven’s (2022) transition model
- Date Crossref
- 02/04/2024
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Columbia Medical Practice pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Danieli (Italy) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
University of Maryland pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Stevenson University Department of Psychology pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
National Cancer Institute Behavioral Research Program pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
CMPC pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Columbia Medical Practice, Danieli (Italy) et University of Maryland, avec 3 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.