Evaluation of pathogenicity of WT1 intron variants by in vitro splicing analysis
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Wilms tumor 1 (WT1; NM_024426) causes Denys–Drash syndrome, Frasier syndrome, or isolated focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Several WT1 intron variants are pathogenic; however, the pathogenicity of some variants remains undefined. Whether a candidate variant detected in a patient is pathogenic is very important for determining the therapeutic options for the patient. Methods In this study, we evaluated the pathogenicity of WT1 gene intron variants with undetermined pathogenicity by comparing their splicing patterns with those of the wild-type using an in vitro splicing assay using minigenes. The three variants registered as likely disease-causing genes: Mut1 (c.1017-9 T > C(IVS5)), Mut2 (c.1355-28C > T(IVS8)), Mut3 (c.1447 + 1G > C(IVS9)), were included as subjects along the 34 splicing variants registered in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD)®. Results The results showed no significant differences in splicing patterns between Mut1 or Mut2 and the wild-type; however, significant differences were observed in Mut3. Conclusion We concluded that Mut1 and Mut2 do not possess pathogenicity although they were registered as likely pathogenic, whereas Mut3 exhibits pathogenicity. Our results suggest that the pathogenicity of intronic variants detected in patients should be carefully evaluated.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of pathogenicity of WT1 intron variants by in vitro splicing analysis
- Date Crossref
- 14/06/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.