Exploring the protective association between COVID-19 infection and laryngeal cancer: insights from a Mendelian randomization study

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Viral infections have been implicated as a risk factor for laryngeal cancer. Given the possible effects of Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the laryngeal tissue, we investigated the causal link between COVID-19 and laryngeal cancer using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Methods: We utilized genetic data from the 5th Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) edition of the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (published on January 18, 2021) and a large-scale laryngeal cancer GWAS comprising 180 cases and 218,612 controls of European ancestry. We applied inverse variance weighting, MR Egger, and weighted median methods to infer causality. We performed sensitivity analysis using the "leave-one-out" method to verify robustness. Results: We found no evidence of a causal association between gene-predicted COVID-19 and laryngeal cancer [Odds ratio (OR)=0.24 (95% Confidence intervals (CI), 0.05-1.26), P=0.09]. However, we observed significant inverse associations between gene-predicted COVID-19 hospitalization [OR=0.51 (95% CI, 0.28-0.95), P=0.03] and severe patients [OR=0.62 (95% CI, 0.43-0.90), P=0.01] and laryngeal cancer. Notably, the study detected important genetic variants, such as rs13050728, that modulate the expression of interferon alpha receptor 2 (IFNAR2), indicating possible roles for immune response pathways in both COVID-19 and cancer. Discussion: This study reveals a potential interaction between COVID-19 severity, genetic factors, and laryngeal cancer, underscoring the importance of investigating the immune response mechanisms in both conditions. These findings contribute to the understanding of the complex interactions between COVID-19 and laryngeal cancer and may guide future research on the role of immune response, particularly involving IFNAR2.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.