A multivariate equivalence test based on Mahalanobis distance with a data-driven margin
Rattachement africain : us, th. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Multivariate equivalence testing is needed in a variety of scenarios for drug development. For example, drug products obtained from natural sources may contain many components for which the individual effects and/or their interactions on clinical efficacy and safety cannot be completely characterized. Such lack of sufficient characterization poses a challenge for both generic drug developers to demonstrate and regulatory authorities to determine the sameness of a proposed generic product to its reference product. Another case is to ensure batch-to-batch consistency of naturally derived products containing a vast number of components, such as botanical products. The equivalence or sameness between products containing many components that cannot be individually evaluated needs to be studied in a holistic manner. Multivariate equivalence test based on Mahalanobis distance may be suitable to evaluate many variables holistically. Existing studies based on such method assumed either a predetermined constant margin, for which a consensus is difficult to achieve, or a margin derived from the data, where, however, the randomness is ignored during the testing. In this study, we propose a multivariate equivalence test based on Mahalanobis distance with a data-drive margin with the randomness in the margin considered. Several possible implementations are compared with existing approaches via extensive simulation studies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A multivariate equivalence test based on Mahalanobis distance with a data-driven margin
- Date Crossref
- 18/05/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.