The Prevalence of Pretransplant Frailty and Mental Distress in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Association with Clinical Outcomes

Le résumé fourni par la source

Frailty is a phenotype of decreased physiologic reserve associated with increased risk of toxicities and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. The incidence, predictors, and adverse effects of pre-HCT frailty are not well known. We evaluated the association of pre-HCT frailty, defined using Fried's criteria, with age and baseline characteristics in patients ≥18 years undergoing autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) HCT for hematological malignancies. Assessments were performed as part of routine pre-HCT evaluations and then retrospectively analyzed. We additionally investigated the association of mental health distress indicators with frailty and the association between frailty and transplant outcomes including NRM and overall survival (OS) plus healthcare utilization. Patients undergoing HCT for hematological malignancies were analyzed (total n = 300; 162 auto, 138 allo). The overall prevalence of frailty was 18%, 21.7% among alloHCT, and 14.8% among autoHCT recipients, with similar distributions of frailty domains. Logistic regression analysis of the overall cohort revealed that older age was associated with an increased risk of frailty (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.02-1.82]; P = 0.04). AlloHCT (OR 2.03, CI [1.07-3.84]; P = .03), and patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (health depression) score ≥10 (OR 6.28, CI 1.93-20.43; P < .01) were each independently associated with pre-HCT frailty. In alloHCT patients, older age (OR 1.44, CI [1.00-2.06]; P = .05) was the only significant risk factor for pre-HCT frailty, while for autoHCT patients, only a higher PHQ-9 score was associated with frailty (OR 6.43, CI [1.34-30.82]; P = .02). For the whole cohort OS at 1 year was lower in frail recipients at 83% (95% CI, 70-91%) versus 92% (95% CI, 88-95%) in nonfrail (P = .04); with multivariate analysis showing higher risk of death in the frail group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.31, CI 0.97-5.46; P = .06). In the alloHCT cohort, multivariate analysis showed greater 1-year mortality in frail recipients (HR 2.55, CI [0.99-6.56]; P = .053). In the alloHCT recipients, we observed a 1-year NRM of 20% in frail patients versus 9% in nonfrail, and multivariate analysis showed a marginally higher risk of NRM in the frail group (HR 2.70, CI 0.90-8.10; P = .08). Frailty was not associated with higher risk of relapse in alloHCT or autoHCT recipients. Frail alloHCT patients experienced a longer initial hospital stay following HCT compared to nonfrail recipients (P < .01). We observed a high prevalence of pre-HCT frailty across all age groups, and identify older age is a risk factor for frailty, particularly in alloHCT recipients. Frailty is associated with a greater risk of NRM and lower survival which needs investigation in a larger cohort. Frailty associates with greater HCT complexity suggesting a need for early assessments and targeted interventions for this vulnerable population. Our findings suggest the utility of frailty and mental distress screening along with multidisciplinary interventions in pre-HCT to limit the morbidity of HCT.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.