Towards an unbiased characterization of genetic polymorphism: a comparison of 27 A. thaliana genomes

Résumé fourni par la source

Our view of genetic polymorphism is shaped by methods that provide a limited and reference-biased picture. Long-read sequencing technologies, which are starting to provide nearly complete genome sequences for population samples, should solve the problem—except that characterizing and making sense of non-SNP variation is difficult even with perfect sequence data. Here we analyze 27 genomes of Arabidopsis thaliana in an attempt to address these issues, and illustrate what can be learned by analyzing whole-genome polymorphism data in an unbiased manner. Estimated genome sizes range from 135 to 155 Mb, with differences almost entirely due to centromeric and rDNA repeats that are difficult to assemble. The completely assembled chromosome arms comprise roughly 120 Mb in all accessions, but are full of structural variants, largely due to transposable elements. Even with only 27 accessions, a pan-genome coordinate system that includes the resulting variation ends up being ∼ 70% larger than the size of any one genome. Our analysis reveals an incompletely annotated mobile-ome: we not only detect several novel TE families, but also find that existing TE annotation is a poor predictor of elements that have recently been active. In contrast to this, the genic portion, or “gene-ome”, is highly conserved. By annotating each genome using accession-specific transcriptome data, we find that 13% of all (non-TE) genes are segregating in our 27 accessions, but most of these are transcriptionally silenced. Finally, we show that with short-read data we previously massively underestimated genetic variation of all kinds, including SNPs—mostly in regions where short reads could not be mapped reliably, but also where reads were mapped incorrectly. We demonstrate that SNP-calling errors can be biased by the choice of reference genome, and that RNA-seq and BS-seq results can be strongly affected by mapping reads only to a reference genome rather than to the genome of the assayed individual. In conclusion, while whole-genome polymorphism data pose tremendous analytical challenges, they also have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of genome evolution.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.