eTEP RIVES-STOPPA VS. TOTAL VISCERAL SAC SEPARATION (TVS) TECHNIQUE: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TWO MINIMALLY INVASIVE SUBLAY APPROACHES FOR MIDLINE HERNIAS
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Background Minimally invasive abdominal wall surgery is rapidly evolving, with techniques like IPOM, TAPP and TEP increasingly being used. The latter one allows for a laparoscopic retromuscular mesh placement but often requires extensive fascial dissection. In contrast, the European Hernia Society suggests an open preperitoneal repair for smaller hernias. Recently, a different laparoscopic preperitoneal approach has been described, being essential to understand the differences between both planes. Methods A 67-year-old female patient, with no comorbidities, consulted for multiple primary ventral hernias confirmed by CT scan. Another 57-year-old woman, with previous multiple pregnancies, presented with an umbilical hernia. Both with concomitant rectus diastasis. The first underwent an eTEP Rives-Stoppa, whereas the other one, a Total Visceral Sac Separation (TVS) technique; either with a down-to-up approach. Results eTEP allowed for three M2-3W1-2 hernias reduced, the retromuscular plane dissected and the defects repaired before mesh placement; operative time (OT) was 120 minutes. In the TVS technique, an M3W1 hernia was repaired following and dissecting a wide preperitoneal space. Incidental peritoneal opening was corrected with a running barbed suture and the defect closed with a trans-fascial repair; OT was 65 minutes. No immediate post-operative complications were reported. Conclusions Differences between a preperitoneal and retromuscular approach for hernia repair are highlighted. Patients with W1 hernias could benefit from a TVS approach, being less invasive, and having advantages such as reduced abdominal wall trauma, potentially faster recovery and fewer postoperative complications, making it a suitable option for these hernias.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- eTEP RIVES-STOPPA VS. TOTAL VISCERAL SAC SEPARATION (TVS) TECHNIQUE: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TWO MINIMALLY INVASIVE SUBLAY APPROACHES FOR MIDLINE HERNIAS
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2024
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Department of General and Digestive Surgery pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Department of General and Digestive Surgery — Hospital Clínic de Barcelona.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.