Prevalence of PTSD in Active Duty Members with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI), particularly mild TBI (mTBI), is a significant health concern for U.S. active duty service members (ADSMs), with potential implications for psychiatric outcomes including PTSD. Despite recognizing this association, the prevalence of PTSD among ADSMs with mTBI remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A thorough search in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO databases from 2008 to 2024 focused on identifying studies involving ADSMs with PTSD and mTBI. The R software (version 4.3.2) was employed for meta-analysis with the "meta" and "meta prop" packages. RESULTS: Eight reviewed studies revealed a pooled prevalence estimate of PTSD among ADSMs with mTBI at 36% (95% CI, 30%-41%, P < .01, I2 = 96%). Cohort studies indicated a slightly higher prevalence of 38% (95% CI, 19%-59%, P < .01, I2 = 98%), whereas cross-sectional studies provided a marginally lower prevalence of 34% (95% CI, 27%-40%, P < .01, I2 = 92%). CONCLUSION: Methodological differences, including diagnostic criteria variability, contribute to the observed variability in prevalence estimates. Despite methodological challenges, this study provides crucial insights into the pooled prevalence of comorbid PTSD and mTBI within the military, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies and further research to refine understanding and support strategies for affected individuals.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence of PTSD in Active Duty Members with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- Date Crossref
- 27/05/2024
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of California pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing Department of Physiological Nursing pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, University of California et Department of Physiological Nursing — Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.