Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the metacognitive awareness scale among nursing students
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective: This study endeavors to translate and psycho-metrically validate the metacognitive awareness inventory scale (MAS) for nursing students in China. Method: A total of 592 nursing students were enlisted from four universities situated in the eastern, southern, western, and northern regions of China. Content validity and reliability were evaluated using the content validity index and item-total correlation coefficient, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients, respectively. Convergent validity examined the goodness of fit among sub-scales through the average extracted variance and composite reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the first-order and second-order factor models, contributing to a cumulative variance of 89.4 and 59.5%, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha values were 0.963 and 0.801, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis outcomes indicated an excellent overall fit index for the model, satisfying the convergent validity criteria and achieving a target coefficient of 96.0%, which is consistent with the original scale structure. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the MAS (C-MAS) is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing metacognitive awareness among Chinese nursing students. Further research should consider a broader sample of nursing students across China to reinforce the scale's applicability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the metacognitive awareness scale among nursing students
- Date Crossref
- 16/05/2024
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Huzhou Normal University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Ningbo Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Hebei University of Chinese Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Weifang University of Science and Technology Department of Nursing pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
College of Medical Science Department of Nursing pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Huzhou Normal University, Ningbo Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) — Zhejiang Chinese Medical University et Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.