Tree growth, mortality and recruitment of stand dynamics over 10 years (2012-2022) in tropical forests, Phou Khao Khouay National Park, Laos
Résumé fourni par la source
The present study delved into the dynamics of tree communities in a specific area within Phou Khao Khouay National Park in Laos, distinguished by three distinct tropical forest types: Dry Evergreen Forest (DEF), Mixed Deciduous Forest (MDF), and Mixed Coniferous Forest (MCF). Conducted over a decade, from 2012 to 2022, we utilized data from a previous inventory carried out in 32 permanent plots, each measuring 50 m × 50 m. Trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 10 cm were identified, tagged, and measured for various parameters. In 2012, we documented 4,072 stems, amounting to 395 species existing within 155 families across the 32 plots, with a total area of 8 ha. By 2022, the number of stems had increased to 4,402, but the species and family counts had decreased to 311 and 135, respectively. Over the ten years, there was a notable increase in the number of stems, basal area (BA), and aboveground biomass (AGB), accompanied by a reduction in species and families. This study contributes valuable insights that can be utilized to enhance forest management practices. The observed trends provide a nuanced understanding of the dynamic nature of the forest ecosystems in the study area. The findings underscore the importance of considering individual forest types when implementing conservation strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tree growth, mortality and recruitment of stand dynamics over 10 years (2012-2022) in tropical forests, Phou Khao Khouay National Park, Laos
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2024
- Éditeur
- Vietnam National University of Forestry
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.