Change in Volumes and Location of Preterm White Matter Injury over a Period of 15 Years
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether white matter injury (WMI) volumes and spatial distribution, which are important predictors of neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants, have changed over a period of 15 years. STUDY DESIGN: Five hundred and twenty-eight infants born <32 weeks' gestational age from 2 sequential prospective cohorts (cohort 1: 2006 through 2012; cohort 2: 2014 through 2019) underwent early-life (median 32.7 weeks postmenstrual age) and/or term-equivalent-age MRI (median 40.7 weeks postmenstrual age). WMI were manually segmented for quantification of volumes. There were 152 infants with WMI with 74 infants in cohort 1 and 78 in cohort 2. Multivariable linear regression models examined change in WMI volume across cohorts while adjusting for clinical confounders. Lesion maps assessed change in WMI location across cohorts. RESULTS: There was a decrease in WMI volume in cohort 2 compared with cohort 1 (β = -0.6, 95% CI [-0.8, -0.3], P < .001) with a shift from more central to posterior location of WMI. There was a decrease in clinical illness severity of infants across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: We found a decrease in WMI volume and shift to more posterior location in very preterm infants over a period of 15 years. This may potentially reflect more advanced maturation of white matter at the time of injury which may be related to changes in clinical practice over time.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Change in Volumes and Location of Preterm White Matter Injury over a Period of 15 Years
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.