Optimizing clinical interpretability of functional evidence in epilepsy-related ion channel variants

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Variants in genes encoding the voltage-gated ion channels are among the most common monogenic causes of epilepsy and neurodevelopmental disorders. Functional effects of a variant are increasingly important for diagnosis and therapeutic decisions. To incorporate knowledge regarding functional consequences in formal clinical variant interpretation, we developed an approach for evaluating multiple functional measurements within the Bayesian framework of the modified ACMG/AMP guidelines. We analyzed 216 functional assessments of 191 variants in SCN1A (n=74), SCN2A (n=66), SCN3A (n=18), and SCN8A (n=33). Of 20 commonly measured biophysical parameters, the most frequent drivers of overall functional consequence were persistent current (f=0.54), voltage dependence of activation (f=0.51), and voltage dependence of fast inactivation (f=0.40) for gain-of-function and peak current (f=0.87) for loss-of-function. By comparing measurements of 23 benign variants, we determined thresholds by which published data on these four parameters confer Strong evidence of variant pathogenicity (likelihood ratio > 18.7) under the ACMG/AMP rubric. Similarly, we delineated evidence weights for the most common epilepsy-related potassium channel gene, KCNQ2 , through reports of 80 pathogenic and 24 benign variants, accounting for heterozygous and homozygous experimental conditions. We collected the resulting categorization of functional data into FENICS, a biomedical ontology of 152 standardized terms for coherent annotation of electrophysiological results. Across 271 variants in SCN1A/2A/3A/8A and KCNQ2 , 1,731 annotations are available in ClinVar, facilitating use of this evidence in variant classification. In summary, we introduce and apply an ACMG/AMP-calibrated framework for electrophysiological studies in epilepsy-related channelopathies to delineate the impact of functional evidence on clinical variant interpretation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.