Overall survival in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with protocol CALGB 9511 at a tertiary hospital in the state of Ceará.
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common neoplasm in childhood and has high survival rates. In adults, due to the biological characteristics of the disease and chemotherapy-related toxicity, survival is lower. CALGB 9511 is a chemotherapy protocol based on pediatric regimens with high remission rates after induction. Objectives: To evaluate the survival of patients with ALL undergoing the CALGB 9511 protocol at Walter Cantídio University Hospital (HUWC); to describe the impact of risk factors: presence of measurable residual disease, BCR-ABL fusion gene status, and allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) on the survival of this group. Methodology: Retrospective evaluation of medical records of patients with ALL treated with this protocol between 2011 and 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate survival probability. Results: 79 patients were eligible; 19% were BCR-ABL positive; the mean 2-year overall survival was 44%; The 2-year survival rate for patients undergoing HSCT was approximately 78%.. Conclusion: The survival curves of the study conducted at HUWC are similar to those described in the literature and corroborate the severity of the disease. Accessibility to new therapeutic modalities is a strategy that can improve the survival of these patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Overall survival in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with protocol CALGB 9511 at a tertiary hospital in the state of Ceará.
- Date Crossref
- 12/05/2024
- Éditeur
- Journal of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.