Identification of vitamin D-related signature for predicting the clinical outcome and immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma
Résumé fourni par la source
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers globally, seriously endangering people health. Vitamin D was significantly associated with tumor progression and patients' prognosis. Integrative 10 machine learning algorithms were used to develop a Vitamin D-related signature (VRS) with one training cohort and 3 testing cohorts. The performance of VRS in predicting the immunology response was verified using several predicting approaches. The optimal VRS was constructed by stepCox + superPC algorithm. VRS acted as a risk factor for HCC patients. HCC patients with high-risk score had a poor clinical outcome and the AUCs of 1-, 3-, and 5-year ROC were 0.786, 0.755, and 0.786, respectively. A higher level of CD8 + cytotoxic T cells and B cells was obtained in HCC patients with low-risk score. There is higher PD1&CTLA4 immunophenoscore and TMB score in low-risk score in HCC patients. Lower TIDE score and tumor escape score was found in HCC cases with low-risk score. The IC50 value of camptothecin, docetaxel, crizotinib, dasatinib, and erlotinib was lower in HCC cases with high-risk score. HCC patients with high-risk score had a higher score of cancer-related hallmarks, including angiogenesis, glycolysis, and NOTCH signaling. Our study proposed a novel VRS for HCC, which served as an indicator for predicting clinical outcome and immunotherapy responses in HCC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Identification of vitamin D-related signature for predicting the clinical outcome and immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma
- Date Crossref
- 10/05/2024
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.