Risk of adverse events in patients with bullous pemphigoid treated with oral corticosteroids in the United States

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background The potential association of long‐term oral corticosteroid (OCS) use with adverse events (AEs) in patients with bullous pemphigoid (BP) is not well characterized in a real‐world setting. Objectives To evaluate the effect of OCS use and treatment duration on the incident AEs in patients with BP. Methods This retrospective cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims and patient enrollment data from IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus from 2006−2021. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of BP between 1 January 2006 and 30 June 2020 (≥2 claims for BP ≥ 30 days apart). Patients in the OCS cohort also had a claim for OCS use, ≥7.5 mg daily dose of prednisone or equivalent, and no claims for a nonoral systemic corticosteroid (CS) at any time during the study period. A control cohort of patients with BP not using OCS was also selected. Relative risk ratios were estimated between the incidence of AEs in OCS users with different exposure durations (short‐term, <30 days; medium‐term, 30−90 days; long‐term, >90 days) and nonusers by Poisson regression, after adjusting for age, sex, prior drug use, and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index score within the follow‐up period. Results At the 1‐year follow‐up, long‐term OCS users had a higher incidence of infections, cataract, osteoporosis, heart failure, depression or anxiety, and diabetes compared with OCS nonusers (p < 0.05). Furthermore, compared with nonusers, long‐term users had increased 1‐year risks (risk ratio; 95% confidence interval) for heart failure (2.27; 1.50−3.44), diabetes (2.05; 1.30−3.24), osteoporosis (1.72; 1.23−2.41), and infection (1.50; 1.13−1.99). Long‐term OCS users also had increased 1‐year risks for heart failure (2.00; 1.21−3.28) and osteoporosis (1.70; 1.16−2.50) compared with short‐term OCS users. Conclusions Long‐term OCS use (≥7.5 mg) in patients with BP was associated with an increased risk of AEs. Study findings demonstrate a need for steroid‐sparing options with an improved safety profile.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.