Aller au contenu principal
2024 conference-abstract

THE EFFECTS OF MODERATE TO HIGH-LOAD RESISTANCE TRAINING WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION IN HEALTHY ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : au, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS Low-load resistance training (RT) with blood flow restriction (BFR; 20–40% of 1-repetition maximum [1RM]) increases muscle mass and strength comparably to unrestricted high-load RT. As healthy populations are not limited to low-loads, some researchers have also examined whether the adaptations to high-load RT could be enhanced with BFR, though results are inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to investigate whether moderate to high-load resistance training (M-HL RT) with BFR increases muscle mass or strength more than the equivalent training without BFR. METHODS Studies involving M-HL RT (≥60% 1RM) with BFR applied during exercise sets or rest intervals were included. The following databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ProQuest Central, and Google Scholar. Two researchers independently screened the titles and abstracts for eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The full texts of included studies were then independently screened by two researchers. Conflicts were resolved by a third researcher. Following screening, study and participant characteristics, intervention protocol for each group and outcome measures were extracted for each included study. RESULT Ten studies met the criteria for inclusion in this review. All included studies measured muscle strength, with only three reporting greater strength increases after M-HL RT with BFR compared to equivalent training without BFR. Five studies assessed muscle mass, with four reporting similar increases after M-HL RT with and without BFR. One observed a smaller increase in mass after M-HL RT with BFR than without. CONCLUSION Most studies did not observe additional benefit of applying BFR during M-HL RT for muscle strength or mass. Studies which did report benefits of BFR may be limited by methodological issues, impacting the applicability of their findings. Overall, this review does not support using BFR during M-HL RT for additional improvements in muscle strength or mass.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
THE EFFECTS OF MODERATE TO HIGH-LOAD RESISTANCE TRAINING WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION IN HEALTHY ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Date Crossref
01/05/2024
Éditeur
Clinical Exercise Physiology Association
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.