Comparison of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section with Wound infiltration with Local Anesthetic Versus Narcotic Analgesia
Résumé fourni par la source
Objective: To compare the outcome of wound infiltration plus local anesthetic agent versus narcotic analgesia in females undergoing cesarean section Material & Methods: This was a comparative study and study place and period was Unit 3, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Services hospital, Lahore from july 2016 to January 2017. Patients were segregated into two groups. Group A was bupivacaine group. Group B was control group. During the immediate postpartum period, a 100mg dose of intravenous tramadol was administered. Patients were transferred to the postoperative wards and were monitored there for duration of 24 hours. During the next 24 hours patients were asked for pain >4 on VAS and tramadol was given. After 24 hours, pain score was measured. Results: The average age of patients was 26.98±4.87 years, with the mean gestational age in group A being 39.52±1.14 weeks and in group B being 39.62±1.14 weeks. The mean tramadol consumption was 74.53±13.21mg. A significant difference was observed between the study groups in terms of tramadol consumption, with a p- value of 0.000. Conclusion: The patients undergoing caesarean section with wound infiltration with local anesthetic agent showed significantly less tramadol consumption as compared to narcotic analgesia
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section with Wound infiltration with Local Anesthetic Versus Narcotic Analgesia
- Date Crossref
- 28/04/2023
- Éditeur
- Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.