Duct Stenting in Duct-Dependent Systemic Blood Flow, Past, Present, and Future
Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Arterial duct stenting, pioneered in the early 1990s for newborns with a duct-dependent pulmonary and systemic circulation, has evolved significantly over the past decades. This progressive technique has led to the development of novel therapeutic strategies, including the Hybrid approach introduced three decades ago, and more recently, a complete transcatheter approach for treating newborns with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). Subsequently, the transcatheter method has been extended to bi-ventricular lesions and patients with pulmonary hypertension, establishing a reverse Potts-shunt pathophysiology. Considering current experiences, this review aims to assess the strengths, weaknesses, and complications associated with ductal stenting, which represents a critical component of these complex treatment strategies. Despite advancements, the mortality rate of Norwood and Hybrid stage-1 procedures has plateaued, underscoring the importance of enhancing the quality of life of affected patients as the primary therapeutic goal. The prerequisite is a gentle, almost atraumatic medicine, particularly during the newborn period. It is essential to recognize that both the Hybrid and total transcatheter approaches demand comparable experience to Norwood surgery. Successful outcomes hinge on much more than merely inserting a stent into the duct; they require meticulous attention to detail and comprehensive management strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Duct Stenting in Duct-Dependent Systemic Blood Flow, Past, Present, and Future
- Date Crossref
- 25/04/2024
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.