Different PCA approaches for vector functional time series with applications to resistive switching processes
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This paper is motivated by modeling the cycle-to-cycle variability associated with the resistive switching operation behind memristors. Although the data generated by this stochastic process are by nature current–voltage curves associated with the creation (set process) and destruction (reset process) of a conductive filament, the statistical analysis is usually based on analyzing only the scalar time series related to the reset and set voltages/currents in consecutive cycles. As the data are by nature curves, functional principal component analysis is a suitable candidate to explain the main modes of variability associated with these processes. Taking into account this data-driven motivation, in this paper we propose two new forecasting approaches based on studying the sequential cross-dependence between and within a multivariate functional time series in terms of vector autoregressive modelling of the most explicative functional principal component scores. The main difference between the two methods lies in whether a univariate or multivariate PCA is performed so that we have a different set of principal component scores for each functional time series or the same one for all of them. Finally, the sample performance of the proposed methodologies is illustrated by an application on a bivariate functional time series of reset/set curves.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Different PCA approaches for vector functional time series with applications to resistive switching processes
- Date Crossref
- 01/09/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.