Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 conference-abstract

0566 Utilizing a Triage Tool Questionnaire to Identify PAP-Related Issues in Patients Newly-Initiated on Therapy for OSA

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction Developing strategies to enhance Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) adherence is crucial for improving outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We introduce a novel Triage Tool (TT) questionnaire designed to identify specific usage challenges to facilitate targeted interventions. Methods Moderate-severe OSA (AHI≥15) patients newly-initiated on PAP therapy (AutoCPAP, ResMed) were enrolled (Kaiser Permanente, Fontana, CA). A digital platform (Somnoware, Inc.) emailed patients a link to the electronic TT questionnaire at 5, 10, and 30 days post-treatment initiation. The 31-item TT is comprised of 6 domains: Adverse Effects, Pressure, Mask/Device, Disturbed Sleep, Psycho-social, and Unintentional. A Likert scale (1 – 4) was used where ‘1 = not at all’ and ‘4 = a lot’ in response to “how much does this issue bother you?” We characterized the frequency of issues in the overall group and between adherent (Adh) and non-adherent (NA) subgroups (adherent: ≥70% usage, ≥4 hours over 30 days), using descriptive statistics. Results Of 150 enrolled patients (age 48±14; male 58%; AHI 41.1±21.1), 73 were Adh and 77 were NA. Overall TT response rate was 57% (63, 60, 50%, respectively, at day 5, 10, 30) and higher for Adh than NA (70.3% ± 5.0 vs 45.9% ± 6.7) Average number of patient endorsed issues (i.e., responses scored 3 or 4) was higher for NA than Adh and decreased over time – day 5: 4.1 ± 4.2 vs 3.4 ± 4.1; day 10: 3.9 ± 5.4 vs 2.8 ± 3.6; day 30: 2.5 ± 5.4 vs 2.2 ± 3.6. Commonly endorsed issues were: dry throat/mouth (21%), waking too early (20%), mask discomfort (19%), nasal congestion (18%), and difficulty initiating sleep (16%). NA patients additionally endorsed difficulty falling (23%) and staying (19%) asleep, waking with mask off (19%) and embarrassment (23%) or concern about appearance (23%). Adh patients more frequently concerned about traveling with PAP (20%). Conclusion The TT questionnaire identified “mask/device” discomfort and “adverse effects” as commonly endorsed problems among newly-treated OSA patients. NA patients also reported “disturbed sleep” and “psychosocial” barriers. Identifying specific treatment-related problems experienced by individuals may guide targeted interventions. Further psychometric evaluation is underway to refine the TT questionnaire. Support (if any)

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
0566 Utilizing a Triage Tool Questionnaire to Identify PAP-Related Issues in Patients Newly-Initiated on Therapy for OSA
Date Crossref
20/04/2024
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • California University of Pennsylvania pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Kaiser Permanente pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisation à but non lucratif
  • ResMed (Netherlands) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise

California University of Pennsylvania, Kaiser Permanente et ResMed (Netherlands).

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.