Factors that may contribute to non-radical resections in patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer
Rattachement africain : pl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction. Breast-conserving treatment in breast cancer consists of radical removal of the cancerous tumor combined with a satisfactory aesthetic result. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze factors that may contribute to non-radical resections in patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment for infiltrating breast cancer and carcinoma in situ . Material and methods. This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 1,312 patients with stage I and II breast cancer and patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who underwent breast-conserving treatment from January 2013 to December 2022. Results. The number of non-radical resections (R1) was 6.4% (80 cases out of 1,237). Fifty-five (4.4%) of R1 patients were re-operated with larger margins and 25 (2%) had a mastectomy. Analysis of factors contributing to a non-radical resection showed a significant correlation with age, histological type, multifocality, preoperative treatment and clinically detectable lesions. Conclusions. The use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as a standard method in surgical planning of breast cancer treatment, taking into account R1 resection risk factors, will allow better selection of patients eligible for breast-conserving treatment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Factors that may contribute to non-radical resections in patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer
- Date Crossref
- 23/05/2024
- Éditeur
- VM Media Group sp. z o.o
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.