Lattice QCD determination of the normalization of the leading-twist photon distribution amplitude and susceptibility of the quark condensate
Rattachement africain : cy, fr, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The normalization of the leading-twist photon distribution amplitude (DA), f γ ⊥ , is an important ingredient in the study of exclusive processes involving the photon emission by means of QCD sum-rules. In this paper we determine the up-, down- and strange-quark contribution to f γ ⊥ by exploiting its relation to the zero-momentum two-point correlation function of the electromagnetic current J em μ and the electric component of the tensor current T μ ν . To that end we employ the gauge ensembles obtained by using N f = 2 + 1 + 1 Wilson-Clover twisted-mass quark flavors, generated by the Extended Twisted Mass (ETM) Collaboration, and after adding all sources of systematic uncertainties, we obtain a total error of 1.5% and 3.5%, respectively, for the light- ( u and d ) and strange-quark contribution to f γ ⊥ ( 2 GeV ) in the MS ¯ scheme, thus improving their accuracy by a factor of 2.3 and 2.8, respectively. For the strange-quark contribution f γ , s ⊥ ( 2 GeV ) , we observe a discrepancy with respect to previous lattice calculations. By combining our result with the world average lattice value of the chiral condensate, we obtain for the susceptibility of the quark condensate χ d MS ¯ ( 2 GeV ) ≃ χ u MS ¯ ( 2 GeV ) = 2.17 ( 12 ) GeV − 2 . Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lattice QCD determination of the normalization of the leading-twist photon distribution amplitude and susceptibility of the quark condensate
- Date Crossref
- 12/08/2024
- Éditeur
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.