Efficacy of a physical activity regimen on visual outcomes among persons newly diagnosed with abnormal glucose tolerance: Study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background: Abnormal Glucose Tolerance (AGT), which encompasses diabetes and prediabetes, is a growing health problem globally. It is affecting millions and predisposing such patients to several complications, including ocular complications. Physical activity has been found to improve glycemic levels, but the specific effect on visual outcomes in a newly diagnosed African population with AGT is yet to be explored fully. This pilot randomized controlled trial seeks to evaluate the efficacy of a physical activity intervention among newly diagnosed persons with AGT in Cape Coast, Ghana. Methods: An ostensibly healthy population will be screened for AGT. Persons newly diagnosed with AGT will be recruited into the randomized controlled trial. About 50 newly diagnosed participants with AGT will undergo a 12-week moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) intervention, specifically exercises that burn more than 3.0 metabolic equivalents (METs), to ascertain its effect on their visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, central visual field and diabetic retinopathy status. The participants will be randomized into a physical activity intervention group and a control group. Assessments will be done at baseline, and treatment outcomes will be done on the last day of the intervention for each participant. Discussion: Physical activity is a proven lifestyle intervention that reduces glycemic levels in people with AGT. Unfortunately, many persons are unaware of their high level of glucose tolerance, which is associated with the deterioration of vision. This study intends to investigate and present findings on the advantages of physical activity interventions on visual outcomes among people with AGT. The study holds promise in informing evidence-based interventions for persons with AGT in poor economies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.