Aller au contenu principal
2024 article

A Novel Bone-Screw-Fastener Demonstrates Greater Maximum Compression Force Before Failure Compared With a Traditional Buttress Screw

2Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the maximal compression force before thread stripping of the novel bone-screw-fastener (BSF) with the traditional buttress screw (TBS) in synthetic osteoporotic and cadaveric bone models. METHODS: The maximum compression force of the plate-bone interface before loss of screw purchase during screw tightening was measured between self-tapping 3.5-mm BSF and 3.5-mm TBS using calibrated load cells. Three synthetic biomechanical models were used: a synthetic osteoporotic diaphysis (model 1), a 3-layer biomechanical polyurethane foam with 50-10-50 pounds-per-cubic-foot layering (model 2), and a 3-layer polyurethane foam with 50-15-50 pounds-per-cubic-foot layering (model 3). For the cadaveric metaphyseal model, 3 sets of cadaveric tibial plafonds and 3 sets of cadaveric tibial plateaus were used. A plate with sensors between the bone and plate interface was used to measure compression force during screw tightening in the synthetic bone models, while an annular load cell that measured screw compression as it slid through a guide was used to measure compression in the cadaver models. RESULTS: Across all synthetic osteoporotic bone models, the BSF demonstrated greater maximal compression force before stripping compared with the TBS [model 1, 155.51 N (SD = 7.77 N) versus 138.78 N (SD = 12.74 N), P = 0.036; model 2, 218.14 N (SD = 14.15 N) versus 110.23 N (SD = 8.00 N), P < 0.001; model 3, 382.72 N (SD = 20.15) versus 341.09 N (SD = 15.57 N), P = 0.003]. The BSF had greater maximal compression force for the overall cadaver trials, the tibial plafond trials, and the tibial plateau trials [overall, 111.27 N vs. 97.54 N (SD 32.32 N), P = 0.002; plafond, 149.6 N versus 132.92 N (SD 31.32 N), P = 0.006; plateau, 81.33 N versus 69.89 N (SD 33.38 N), P = 0.03]. CONCLUSIONS: The novel bone-screw-fastener generated 11%-65% greater maximal compression force than the TBS in synthetic osteoporotic and cadaveric metaphyseal bone models. A greater compression force may increase construct stability, facilitate early weight-bearing, and reduce construct failure.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
A Novel Bone-Screw-Fastener Demonstrates Greater Maximum Compression Force Before Failure Compared With a Traditional Buttress Screw
Date Crossref
01/07/2024
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesBone fractures and treatmentsOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.