Comparison of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Assays in Non-small cell lung cancer Patients
Rattachement africain : lt, in, de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent type of lung cancer the mutational spectrum of which has been extensively characterized. Treatment of patients with NSCLC based on their molecular profile is now part of the standard clinical care. The aim of this study was firstly to investigate two different NGS-based tumor profile genetic tests and secondly to assess the clinical actionability of the mutations and their association with survival and clinicopathological characteristics. Overall, 52 mutations were identified in 31 patients by either one or both assays. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (40.4%), KRAS (13.46%) and EGFR (9.62%). TP53 and KRAS mutations were associated with worst overall survival while KRAS was positively correlated with adenocarcinoma. The two methods showed a high concordance for the commonly covered genomic regions (97.14%). Ten mutations were identified in a genomic region exclusively covered by the NIPD Genetics custom tumor profile assay. Likewise, one MET mutation was identified by the Ion Amliseq assay in a genomic region exclusively covered by Ion Amliseq. In conclusion both assays showed highly similar results in the commonly covered genomic areas, however, the NIPD Genetics assay identified additional clinically actionable mutations that can be applied in clinical practice for personalized treatment decision making for patients with NSCLC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparison of Targeted Next Generation Sequencing Assays in Non-small cell lung cancer Patients
- Date Crossref
- 08/04/2024
- Éditeur
- Research Square Platform LLC
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.