Relationship between early infant motor repertoire and neurodevelopment on the hammersmith infant neurological examination in a developmentally vulnerable First Nations cohort

Résumé fourni par la source

AIM: To implement a culturally-adapted screening program aimed to determine the ability of infant motor repertoire to predict early neurodevelopment on the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) and improve Australian First Nations families' engagement with neonatal screening. METHODS: weeks (V1; <14 weeks) and 14-18 weeks (V2; ≥14 weeks) corrected age (CA). At 4-9 months CA neurodevelopment was assessed on the HINE and classified according to age-specific cut-off and optimality scores as; developmentally 'on track' or high chance of either adverse neurodevelopmental outcome (ad-NDO) or cerebral palsy (CP). RESULTS: Families were highly engaged, 139/148 (94 %) eligible infants completing MOS-R, 136/150 (91 %), HINE and 123 (83 %) both. Lower MOS-R at V2 was associated with reduced HINE scores (β = 1.73, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-2.42) and high chance of CP (OR = 2.63, 95%CI = 1.21-5.69) or ad-NDO (OR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.10-1.74). The MOS-R sub-category 'observed movement patterns' best predicted HINE, infants who score '4' had mean HINE 19.4 points higher than score '1' (95%CI = 12.0-26.9). Receiver-operator curve analyses determined a MOS-R cut-off of <23 was best for identifying mild to severely reduced HINE scores, with diagnostic accuracy 0.69 (sensitivity 0.86, 95%CI 0.76-0.94 and specificity 0.40, 95 % CI 0.25-0.57). A trajectory of improvement on MOS-R (≥2 point increase in MOS-R from 1st to 2nd video) significantly increased odds of scoring optimally on HINE (OR = 5.91, 95%CI 1.16-29.89) and may be a key biomarker of 'on track' development. INTERPRETATION: Implementation of a culturally-adapted program using evidence-based assessments demonstrates high retention. Infant motor repertoire is associated with HINE scores and the early neurodevelopmental status of developmentally vulnerable First Nations infants.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.